Ma Google Search !!!!!!

Custom Search

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Who is Anna Hazare? What is Lokpal Bill?


Very few social activists have captured the attention of Indians across the globe as Anna Hazare did during his "fast unto death" over the issue of the Lokpal Bill in New Delhi in April 2011. 

Hazare, a Gandhian by belief, outlook and practice, has become the face of India's fight against corruption. During his fast over the Lokpal Bill, Hazare, a quintessential traditional Indian by looks and mannerism, managed to inspire and mobilize the support of even the ultra-modern Indians - Indians for whom the word "social" only means having a profile on social networking sites. 

The "Anna Hazare fast" can be described as the first real "social networking movement" in India. Hazare, a former Army man, began his social activism from Ralegan Siddhi, a village in Ahmednagar district in Maharashtra, where he successfully led a movement against alcoholism and made Ralegan Siddhi a "model village". From a soldier to a social reformer, and a right to information crusader, Anna Hazare's journey of four decades has been unprecedented in terms of a non-violent yet effective campaign of resurrecting a barren village into an 'ideal village' model and empowering the faceless citizen through pioneering work on Right to Information.

Lokpal Bill:
The Lokpal is a body with a chairperson who is or was a Chief Justice of India and eight other members. The Lokpal Bill, an effort to rein in the pervasive corruption in public life, was first floated in the late 60s, but failed to become law despite successive attempts. 

Implementation of the Lokpal bill will hopefully reduce corruption in India. The basic idea of the Lokpal is borrowed from the office of the ombudsman in other countries. It provides for filing complaints of corruption against ministers and members of parliament with the ombudsman. 

The government's Lokpal Bill has kept the Prime Minister and the judiciary as well as conduct of MPs in Parliament out of the ambit of the anti-corruption watchdog. The PM, however, will come under the purview of Lokpal after he demits office. The bill gives permission to Lokpal to probe any Union minister or officials of Group 'A' and above rank without any sanction. 

According to the government's draft, the body will have a chairperson and eight members, including four judicial members - who will be former or sitting judges of Supreme Court or chief justices of the high court. The Lok Ayuktas in the states does not come under the purview of this bill as the Centre cannot intervene in the powers of the state. The Lokpal will have its own prosecution and investigation wing with officers and staff necessary to carry out its functions.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Battle of words between Nasser Hussain and Ravi Shastri !!!

The controversial Decision Review System (DRS) was at the crux of a verbal joust between commentators Ravi Shastri and Nasser Hussain while on the air during Day 3 of the ongoing Trent Bridge Test between England and India. 

Earlier, in a column for a leading local newspaper, Hussain had stated that it was a 'disgrace' that the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) had refused to accept the use of lbw reviews, adding that a holistic implementation of the DRS should be made mandatory by the International Cricket Council (ICC) , instead of leaving the choice to individual boards.

The BCCI is reluctant to call the Hawk-Eye into play for adjudging leg-befores as it feels that the technology is not foolproof yet. But the issue came to the fore on Day 2 when Harbhajan Singh was given out lbw off Stuart Broad's bowling when replays showed a clear inside edge onto his pads.

Reacting to Hussain's salvo, Shastri slammed him indirectly on a pre-play show for insinuating that the ICC was pandering to the whims and fancies of the BCCI and that India's tremendous stature in the game had spawned jealously in the rest of the cricketing fraternity. "They (England) are jealous about the way the IPL is going, jealous that India is No.1 in world cricket, jealous about the fact that India are world champions. They are jealous because of the too much money being made by BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India). Bottom-line is that they have never been No. 1 in the world in Test cricket."

Then on Day 3 while the two were sharing the microphone in the commentary box, Hussain picked a bone with Shastri. "Ravi, I just want to pick you up on something you said on a show yesterday, questioning my right to call non-use of DRS a disgrace. Well, I have earned that right after 96 Test matches to voice my opinion on the game of cricket. It is my job and my right to voice my opinion," the former England captain said."You also said that there was a jealousy factor about India going to be No.1. No one is more proud than me about India at top," Hussain added.

Shastri however, stuck to his guns. "You said, disgrace India not taking it. India has got every right to decide whether to take it or not. India decided not to take it because they don't think it is foolproof. Technology is improving all the time and after seeing the way Hot-Spot has behaved, Hot-Spot has become cold spot. I think India has got every right to believe and do what they did. England were the last to adopt the DRS and now they vouch by it. India tested it three years back and they had a problem with it in the series against Sri Lanka. Yes, Harbhajan's dismissal was a howler and it should not have happened."